A apresentação está carregando. Por favor, espere

A apresentação está carregando. Por favor, espere

Need to evaluate management Control the costs Fulfill new requirements Greater demandings Creation of information systems that allow to grade the.

Apresentações semelhantes


Apresentação em tema: "Need to evaluate management Control the costs Fulfill new requirements Greater demandings Creation of information systems that allow to grade the."— Transcrição da apresentação:

1

2

3

4 Need to evaluate management Control the costs Fulfill new requirements Greater demandings Creation of information systems that allow to grade the management [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June

5 In a general way… …measurement units to monitor and evaluate through comparison between different entities …are… Two main functions EvaluateDescribe [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June

6 Efficiency Efficacy Effectiveness Cost-efficiency Comparability Availability Relevance Consistency Reliability [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June [4] Correia L F. Indicadores de Desempenho Económico na Saúde [Internet]. 2005

7 Lack of technical means Input/Output measurement difficulties Availability of funding Employees lack of instruction Little dynamism from commissions responsible for executing indicators Inadequacies of information systems [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June [4] Correia L F. Indicadores de Desempenho Económico na Saúde [Internet]. 2005

8 Facing an inefficient and non productive governmental management of public health systems Construction of evaluation means for the efficiency and effectiveness levels of health systems [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June

9 Comparative quality reporting Public reporting Pay-for-performance Public reporting Pay-for-performance Comparative quality reporting

10 The financing of Health entities is based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) Sorting systems for patients in clinically coherent and homogeneous groups – in a resource consumption point of view Built from the diagnostic features and patients therapeutic profiles that explain the resource consumption in hospitals Tendency to rationalize the funds distribution process [5] Bentes M, Gonçalves M, Urbano J, Tranquada S. A utilização dos GDHs como instrumento de financiamento hospitalar. Revista Gestão Hospitalar December-1997 January;33:

11

12 Norte Centro Lisboa Alentejo Algarve Região Autónoma dos Açores Região Autónoma da Madeira Establish a comparison between the different areas of Portugal Compare the numbers from 2000 to 2007 Evolution of the services quality and efficiency [25] Nomenclatura de Unidades Territoriais para fins estatísticos, Wikipédia, 2008 [26] Parlamento Europeu, Conselho da União Europeia. Regulamento (CE) N.º 1059/2003 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselo, relativo à instituição de uma Nomenclatura Comum das Unidades Territoriais Estatísticas (NUTS), Jornal Oficial da União Europeia May 26.

13

14 Excluded episodes (ambulatory episodes): Planned admission Release date equals admission date Patients do not change hospitals Patients do not leave against medical advice nor die % Inpatient episode85,4 Ambulatory episode14,6 Database with inpatient episodes from 87 Portuguese public Hospitals between 2000 and 2007

15 Gender Male 44,4 Female 55,6 Age 1719, , , , , , ,2 7518,2 Nuts II Alentejo4,9 Algarve3,7 Centro26,0 Lisboa26,5 Norte33,8 Discharge Year , , , , , , , ,5 Total admissions:

16 HOSP_ID EPIS_ID SEXO DDX1-DDX20 SRG1-SRG20 DSP BIRTH_WGT ADM_TIP HOSP_FROM HOSP_TO TOTDIAS SAIDLAST DRG MDC RESIDE ENT1 HOSP_RESIDE DISTANCIA

17 Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Newborns Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Unspecified surgical procedures Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Medical DRGs complications Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal Deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Discharged patients Exceptional admission episodes Surgical admission time Complication-free long-term admissions Readmissions Short-term inappropriate admissions Newborns Vaginal deliveries Unspecified surgical procedures Medical drgs complications

18 b) Establish a comparison between the different areas of Portugal a) Compare the numbers from 2000 to 2007

19 2000(%)2001(%)2002(%)2003(%)2004(%)2005(%)2006(%)2007(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 19,219,419,719,8 20,319,719,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,42,11,91,71,61,5 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 1,3 1,00,8 0,60,50,6 Readmissions45,845,546,045,9 46,345,844,4 Newborns1,041,081,15 1,081,061,041,02 Vaginal Delivery Complications free75,576,471,374,873,976,772,973,5 With complications24,523,628,725,226,123,327,126,5 Unspecified surgical procedures13,412,612,313,012,612,411,711,8 Medical DRGs complications10,511,312,412,512,214,013,113,9 1) Calculated from a 1 % sample

20 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9 Alentejo (%)Algarve(%)Centro(%)Lisboa(%)Norte(%) Exceptional admission episodes Short-term episode 16,618,318,621,319,8 Long-term exceptional episode 2,12,41,71,91,6 Complication-free long-term admissions 1) 0,81,40,9 0,8 Readmissions 78,677,675,376,775,3 Newborns 1,1 1,51,21,3 Vaginal Delivery Complications free 86,088,371,273,5 With complications 14,011,7 28,8 26,5 Unspecified surgical procedures 6,33,726,730,127,5 Medical DRGs complications 4,43,226,629,529,9

21 [1] Entidade Reguladora da Saúde. Relatório da Actividade Reguladora de 2007 [Internet]. Porto: 2008 August [accessed 2008 October 30]. Available from Reguladora% pdf/ view. [2] Ministério da Saúde. Diário da República [Internet] January 23 [accessed 2008 October 30]. Portaria n.º 110-A/ ª Série - N.º16. Available from [3] Ribeiro N. Indicadores de Gestão para Administração Pública. TOC June [accessed 2008 October 27]; N.º3. Available from /noticias/Confer Forum.htm. [4] Correia L F. Indicadores de Desempenho Económico na Saúde [Internet] December [accessed 2008 October 27]. Available from Dezembro-2005/ pdf. [5] Bentes M, Gonçalves M, Urbano J, Tranquada S. A utilização dos GDHs como instrumento de financiamento hospitalar. Revista Gestão Hospitalar December-1997 January;33: [6] Eddy D M. Performance measurement: problems and solutions. PubMed [Internet] July-August [accessed 2008 October 27]; 17(4):7-25. Available from EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ ?ordinalpos=8&itool Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum. [7] Freeman T, Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. PubMed [Internet] May [accessed 2008 October 27]; 15(2): Available from pubmed/ [8] Collopy B T. Clinical indicators in accreditation: an effective stimulus to improve patient care. PubMed [Internet] June [accessed 2008 October 27]; 12(3): Available from PEntrez. Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum. [9] Thomson R G, Lally J. Performance management at the crossroads in the NHS: don't go into the red. PubMed Central [Internet] [accessed 2008 October 27]; 9: Available from picrender.fcgi?artid = &blobtype=pdf.http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ [10] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). AHRQ Summary Statement on Comparative Hospital Public Reporting [Internet]. United States of America: Health and Human Services. [accessed 2008 October 27]. Available from: pdf. [11] Kondro W. The joys of quality indicators. Canadian Medical Association Journal January 15; 178(2): [12] Shojania K G, Forster A J. Hospital mortality: when failure is not a good measure of success. Canadian Medical Association Journal July 15; 179(2): [13] Machado M C S. O Plano Nacional da Saúde [Internet]. Portugal (PT): Alto Comissariado da Saúde. [accessed 2008 October 27]. Available from [14] Geraedts M, Schwartze D, Molzahn T. Hospital quality reports in Germany: patien and physician opinion of the reported quality indicators. Canadian Medical Association Journal September 28; 7: 157. [15] Galvin R S. Are performance measures relevant?. Health Affairs July-August; [16] McGlynn E A. Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Medical Care January; 41(1 Suppl):I [17]Thomson R, Taber S, Lally J, Kazandjian V. UK Quality Indicator Project (UK QIP) and the UK independent health care sector: a new development. International Journal for Quality in Health Care April; 16 Suppl:i51-i56.

22 [18] Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Relatório Nacional de Grupos de Diagnósticos Homogéneos [19] Thomas J, Paranjothy S, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. RCOG Press; [20] Faúndes A, Pádua K S, Osis M J D, Cecatti J G, Sousa M H. Brazilian women and physicians' viewpoints on their preferred route of delivery. Revista de Saúde Pública. 2004; 38(4): [21] Reynolds A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa M A, Santos C, Campos I, Montenegro N, Influence of three organisational measures on the cesarean. Acta Médica Portuguesa. 2004; 17: [22] Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Relatório Nacional de Grupos de Diagnósticos Homogéneos Mar. [23] Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Relatório Nacional de Grupos de Diagnósticos Homogéneos Sep. [24] Instituto de Gestão Informática e Financeira da Saúde, Ministério da Saúde. Relatório Nacional de Grupos de Diagnósticos Homogéneos Aug. [25] Nomenclatura de Unidades Territoriais para fins estatísticos [Internet], Wikipédia, 2008 Dec 13 [accessed 2008 Dec 16]. Available from: [26] Parlamento Europeu, Conselho da União Europeia. Regulamento (CE) N.º 1059/2003 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, relativo à instituição de uma Nomenclatura Comum das Unidades Territoriais Estatísticas (NUTS). Jornal Oficial da União Europeia May 26. [27] Ministério da Saúde. I Série-A. Diário da República Nov 5. [28]Pereira A C, Pinto A T, Parry G, Vieira P, Azevedo L F, Martins C, Vieira A, Desenhos de estudos [Internet]. Universidade do Porto, Serviço de Bioestatística e Informática Médica [accessed 2008 Dec 16]. Available from: numero=1&titulo=Desenhos+de+estudo. numero=1&titulo=Desenhos+de+estudo [29] Alto Comissariado da Saúde - Ministério da Saúde. Indicadores e Metas do PNS [Internet] [accessed 2008 Dec 10]. Available from: par=acs&lang=PRT#. par=acs&lang=PRT# [30] Sistema Nacional de Saúde. Indicadores de Desempenho 2004 – 2006 [Internet]. [acessed 2008 Dec 14]. Available from:

23


Carregar ppt "Need to evaluate management Control the costs Fulfill new requirements Greater demandings Creation of information systems that allow to grade the."

Apresentações semelhantes


Anúncios Google