Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL III COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Some achievements 2000-2006 June, 2006.

Apresentação em tema: "Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL III COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Some achievements 2000-2006 June, 2006."— Transcrição da apresentação:

1 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL III COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Some achievements 2000-2006 June, 2006

2 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional + 63.976 +18,7 % NUT II 0 50km 341.404 237.795 253.426 405.380 243.007 240.024 3.472.715 3.711.797 + 239.082 +6,9 % 2.258.768 2.366.691 + 107.923 +4,8 % 2.520.708 2.740.237 + 219.529 +8,7 % 782.331 767.549 - 14.782 -1,9 % - 10.419 - 4,1 % + 2.229 + 0,9 % 1991: 9.867.147 inh. 2003: 10.474.685 inh. 1991 2003: + 607.538 inh + 6,2 % PORTUGAL POPULATION 1991 and 2003

3 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional 2003: 113,9 inh./km 2 PORTUGAL inhabitants per km 2 Increase from 1990 Decrease from 1990 Population Density 2003 103,4 NUT II 174,4 84,0 956,6 24,4 81,2 293,5 0 50km

4 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional Urban Centres The population is concentrated on the littoral

5 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL 050km PORTUGAL 16.3 44.5 12.9 11.1 8.8 6.4 14.3 35.1 12.6 10.9 15.7 11.5 Without 1st cycle 2d cycle 3th cycle Secondary Médium superior % of population for education level 19912001 EDUCATION Level - PORTUGAL

6 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional 8.322 13.365 NUT II 0 50km 9.479 13.017 9.087 13.343 16.004 23.665 9.465 14.084 11.184 17.170 10.613 18.968 GDP per INHABITANT- Regional Distribution PORTUGAL 1995: 11.138 2002: 16.248 GDP in Euros per inhabitant (pps) 19952002

7 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional GVA per SECTORS of ACTIVITY 2001 PORTUGAL % 3,7 27,9 68,4 Primary Secondary Tertiary GVA - % per sectors of activity 3,1 37,1 59,8 5,5 35,0 59,5 0,6 20,2 79,2 15,0 27,557,5 8,6 16,9 74,5 2,9 20,3 76,9 8,1 14,1 77,9 0 50km NUT II

8 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional EMPlOYMENT per SECTORS of ACTIVITY 2003 0 50km 1.793,8 1.289,9 1.289,5 339,2 191,2 102,1 112,3 12,4 41,8 45,7 24,1 31,3 44,6 1,4 24,1 74,6 14,4 25,9 59,6 9,2 21,5 69,3 12,8 28,2 59,0 9,5 26,6 63,8 NUT II PORTUGAL Total Employment (thousand)= 5,118 % Secondary Primary 12,5 32,3 55,2 Tertiary

9 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional PORTUGAL 2003: 6,3 % % of unemployed population 6,8 3,6 8,1 8,2 6,1 2,9 3,4 0 50km Unemployment rate 2003

10 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional The European Union Treatry intitutes the economic and social cohesion principle, whish aims to ensure an harmonious development of the European Space by reducing inequalities between different areas and the underdevelopment of the poorer ones. THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT

11 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional Since its accession to E.C., in January 1986, Portugal has applied, just like the other country members, to this co-financing instrument which, together with national and private investments, has become a decisive support to several development actions that otherwise would never have been possible. Previous Regulations – 1986-1988 Community Support Framework I – 1989-1993 Community Support Framework II – 1994-1999 Community Support Framework III – 2000-2006

12 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional CSF ICSF IICSF III 5.7215.721 14.58914.589 20.52820.528 (Millions of Euros) Structural Funds

13 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional European Regional Development Fund European Social Fund European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund-Guidance Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance In order to achieve those goals, 4 structural funds have been created: E R D F E S F E A G G P F I F G These are co-financing instruments to which member countries can apply in order to assist, over multi-annual periods, all national efforts towards the development and full achievement of the desired cohesion.

14 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional 20 years after Portuguese EU adhesion. 50 billion Euros from Cohesion Policy have been used. Remarkable achievements have been implemented. Nevertheless, persistent structural problems affect our economy, our society and our territory. These persistent structural difficulties occur in the central themes of present growth and employment paradigm. That have territorially differentiated natures and intensities. Cohesion Policy in Portugal

15 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional Remarkable Achievements: PORTUGAL 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 19901991 1992199319941995199619971998 1999 20002001 20022003 2004 LENGH OF MOTORWAY NETWORK PORTUGAL 0 5 10 15 20 25 1980199019952000200120022003 INFANT MORTALITY 15 25 35 45 55 65 19851990 1995 2000 PORTUGAL SECONDARY ENROLMENT PORTUGAL 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 1980199019952000200120022003 LIFE EXPECTANCY AT BIRTH

16 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional GDP pc PPS - EU15=100 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 19851988199119941997 2000 2003 1990 1986 1987 1989 1992 1993 1995 1996 1998 1999 2001 2002 2004 PORTUGAL IRELAND SPAIN GREECE 1990 1991 19921993 1994 19951996 1997 19981999 2000 2001200220032004 EU15 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 PORTUGAL R&D INVESTMENT - %GDP PORTUGAL EU15 0 0,4 0,8 1,2 1,6 2,0 1985 1986198719881989 1990 199119921993 19941995 19961997 1998 1999 2000200120022003 GDP per HOUR WORKED - Annual Increase Rate LONG -TERM UNEMPLOYMENT EU15 PORTUGAL 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 1990 1991 19921993199419951996 1997 1998 19992000200120022003 2004 Persistent Structural Problems:

17 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional National Cohesion Policy is not the only responsible for successes neither for insufficiencies: > Globalisation developments > Trade agreements > Unfavourable EU policies > National public policy formulation and implementation quality > Governance efficiency and effectiveness > …

18 Direcção-Geral do Desenvolvimento Regional But, in what regards National Cohesion Policy, explanations include: > Identification of policy priorities > Dispersion of Operational Programs > Insufficient selectivity of investments > Average dimension of interventions > Effectiveness of interventions on human resources and economic activities > Governance efficiency > …