unesp Gleiciani Bürger Patricio Roberto, Ph.D.: Pós-Doutoranda Prof. David Montenegro Lapola, Ph.D.: Supervisor Ecology and Biodiversity Post-Program UNESP, Rio Claro June 23 rd, 2015 General approach of the II Workshop for PES in rural farms of the interior of São Paulo State: challenges for implementation

Aim To discuss with decision makers the key issues to the PES scheme implementation CHALLENGES!!!

Key Issues: 1.Diagnóstico ambiental 2. Definição dos SA e das metas e ações/práticas passíveis de enquadramento no PSA 3. Definição da área de implementação do Programa de PSA 4. Enquadramento das áreas no Programa de PSA 5. Gestão do Programa de PSA 6. Financiamento do Programa de PSA 7. Fundo Monetário para o Programa 8. Compensação aos provedores dos SA 9. Valoração dos Serviços Ambientais para compensação aos provedores 10. Tempo de projeto e fiscalização 11. Contrapartidas dos provedores

Necessary to select priority areas Help with relevant ESS selection Rio Claro  ✔ 1. Environmental Diagnostics ESS linked to water services  soil and forestry conservation 2. ESS, goals and actions/practices definition to be inserted en the PES scheme definition More degraded sub-basin ✗ Less degraded sub-basin 3. Setting the implementation area of the PSA Program Director forestry plan PCJ Director forestry plan PCJ

The entire property area or only forest area? 4. Field portion definition PCJ or municipal government or private companies … 5. PES management PCJ = some steps payments; City Hall = compensation for services Tax incentives… NGO = technical support Charges in water bill (Opinion Survey) Fines… 6. PES Funding Money is not the problem (?) ≠ valuation methods; ≠ payments/property ≠ valuation methods; ≠ payments/property SEPLADEMA or CONDEMA

Rio Claro  ✔ But… 7. Monetary Fund Many things to define… PES types, owners demands, changes with them, etc.. verify their willingness. 8. ESS providers compensation $ soil conservation ≠ $ forest services 9. ESS valuation to compensate the providers City Hall must verify the situation!

Related to local management  the more detailed and specific steps, more detailed inspection  increase of costs… 10. Project time and inspection To be well – instructed, Fast Communication with a fire station; Built a watch-tower, with the view of the hole property. 11. Providers Counterpart (Maria Eugência comments)